Title: Quiz Chapter 7 and 8
Course: AJS-101 RTZ

Q: The applicability of constitutional rights to all citizens, regardless of state law or procedure.  This is which amendment?
- 14th
- 12th
- 10th
- 7th
A: 14th

Q: The 5th, 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution require_______________________.
- due process
- writ of habeas grabbus
- writ of substantionalism
- The is not a common grond on the three listed.
A: due process

Q: In the 1966 case of Miranda vs. AZ, it came about due to ___________________________.
- denial of due process.
- illegally seized evidence
- racial profiling
- Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.
A: denial of due process.

Q: Brigham City vs. Stuart 2006, stated the following;
- Certain emergencies may justify a police officers decision to search of enter a premises without a warrant.
- Autos are subject to mobility and difert rules reagrding search and seizure apply.
- Foundation for Terry vs. Ohio
- Foundation for Weeks vs. indiana
A: Certain emergencies may justify a police officers decision to search of enter a premises without a warrant.

Q: Illegally seized/acquired evidence is admissible in court under what conditions?
- Is not allowed
- Cases involving illegal aliens
- Child crimes
- Drug crimes
A: Is not allowed

Q: The Good Faith Exception allows for what?
- Evidence seized by mistake may be used in court
- Crimes against the church to go prosecuted aggressively
- Forgiveness by the court for intentional illegal seizure of evidence
- Police may not make mistakes in the obtaining of evidence
A: Evidence seized by mistake may be used in court

Q: A set of fact and circumstances that would induce a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that particular other person has committed a specific crime. Also, reasonable grounds to make of believe an accusation. The necessary level of belief that would allow for police seizures of individuals and full searches of dwellings, vehicles and possessions.  This is:
- Probable cause
- Reasonable suspicion
- SWAG Principle
- Grounds only in court for a formal hearing
A: Probable cause

Q: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable.   What case created this opinion and when did it take place?
- TN vs. Garner 1985
- Garcia vs. CA 1980
- Hunt vs. U.S. 1987
- Miranda vs. AZ 1966
A: TN vs. Garner 1985

Q: Less lethal weapons create an environment where no recipient will die as the result of its use on a person.
- False
- True
- Not a just question...
- Phasers on stun...
A: False

Q: In police work, a liability exists for ___________________________ the result of the 1989 case of Canton, Ohio vs. Harris.
- failure to train
- negligent retention
- invalid background during pre hire
- Bivens action
A: failure to train