On-the-Job Training Guidelines for Advanced Systems Technology by Washburn Institute of Technology
These documents consist of an on-the-job training agreement, a weekly activities report form, and a list of pre-release items.
- Date:
- 2013
- Primary Material Type:
- Assessment Tool
- Institution:
- Washburn Institute of Technology
- Project Name:
- Technical Retraining to Achieve Credentials (TRAC-7)
- Funding Source:
- TAACCCT Round 1
- Subjects:
- on-the-job training, training details, competencies, work experience, activities report, manufacturing, industrial maintenance, Advanced System Technology, employer evaluation, internship training agreement
Industry / Occupation
- Industry Partner:
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
- Industry Sector:
- Manufacturing -- Miscellaneous Manufacturing (339)
- Occupation:
- Production Occupations -- First-Line Supervisors/Managers of Production and Operating Workers (51-1011)
Education / Instructional Information
- Instructional Program:
- Mechanic and Repair Technologies/Technicians (47)
- Credential Type:
-
- Certificate
- Associate Degree
- Educational Level of Materials:
-
- 1st year Community College or equivalent
- Educational Use:
- Provide on-the-job training guidelines and supervisor/employer evaluations.
- Time Required:
- 1 hour
- Language:
- en_US
- Interactivity Type:
- Mix of Active and Presentation
- Quality Rubric:
- Other
- Quality Note:
- If it was determined that the deliverable contained substantive educational content, the deliverable was sent to a third-party subject matter expert for review. A party external to TRAC-7 coordinated this review process. The third-party subject matter experts were identified by the third-party review coordinator as experts in assessing curriculum. The third-party subject matter experts had academic experience in curriculum, assessment, and instruction and primarily consisted of university faculty and administrative staff. Rubrics were chosen by the third-party review coordinator for applicability to the given deliverables. Reviews were conducted by the third-party subject matter experts and sent to the third-party review coordinator, who provided the feedback to grant management. The site coordinators were given the reviewers’ comments from grant management, and had the opportunity to revise deliverables before final submission. The chief academic officers from the consortium institutions certified the deliverables. Grant management uploaded the deliverables to the TAACCCT Repository.
- Course Note:
- Advanced Systems Technology
Accessibility
Copyright / Licensing
Except where otherwise noted, the works contained in this website are licensed under a
Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License. Accessibility Support Strategy.
Terms of Service.